convert SubmittingPatches to restructuredtext
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net>
This commit is contained in:
Nicolas Sebrecht
parent
72285c92f5
commit
48eb48946c
1
Makefile
1
Makefile
@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ man:
|
||||
doc:
|
||||
@$(MAKE) -C docs
|
||||
rst2html.py README.rst readme.html
|
||||
rst2html.py SubmittingPatches.rst SubmittingPatches.html
|
||||
|
||||
targz: ../$(TARGZ)
|
||||
../$(TARGZ):
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,85 +1,97 @@
|
||||
# Checklist (and a short version for the impatient):
|
||||
.. -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
|
||||
## Commits:
|
||||
.. _mailing list: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/offlineimap-project
|
||||
|
||||
- make commits of logical units
|
||||
- check for unnecessary whitespace with "git diff --check"
|
||||
before committing
|
||||
- do not check in commented out code or unneeded files
|
||||
- the first line of the commit message should be a short
|
||||
description (50 characters is the soft limit, see DISCUSSION
|
||||
in git-commit(1)), and should skip the full stop
|
||||
- the body should provide a meaningful commit message, which:
|
||||
- uses the imperative, present tense: "change",
|
||||
not "changed" or "changes".
|
||||
- includes motivation for the change, and contrasts
|
||||
its implementation with previous behaviour
|
||||
- add a "Signed-off-by: Your Name <you@example.com>" line to the
|
||||
commit message (or just use the option "-s" when committing)
|
||||
to confirm that you agree to the Developer's Certificate of Origin
|
||||
- make sure that you have tests for the bug you are fixing
|
||||
- make sure that the test suite passes after your commit
|
||||
=================================================
|
||||
Checklist (and a short version for the impatient)
|
||||
=================================================
|
||||
|
||||
## Patch:
|
||||
Commits
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
- use "git format-patch -M" to create the patch
|
||||
- do not PGP sign your patch
|
||||
- do not attach your patch, but read in the mail
|
||||
body, unless you cannot teach your mailer to
|
||||
leave the formatting of the patch alone.
|
||||
- be careful doing cut & paste into your mailer, not to
|
||||
corrupt whitespaces.
|
||||
- provide additional information (which is unsuitable for
|
||||
the commit message) between the "---" and the diffstat
|
||||
- if you change, add, or remove a command line option or
|
||||
make some other user interface change, the associated
|
||||
documentation should be updated as well.
|
||||
- if your name is not writable in ASCII, make sure that
|
||||
you send off a message in the correct encoding.
|
||||
- send the patch to the lists
|
||||
(offlineimap-project@lists.alioth.debian.org) and the
|
||||
maintainer (nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net) if (and only if)
|
||||
the patch is ready for inclusion. If you use git-send-email(1),
|
||||
please test it first by sending email to yourself.
|
||||
- see below for instructions specific to your mailer
|
||||
* make commits of logical units
|
||||
* check for unnecessary whitespace with ``git diff --check``
|
||||
before committing
|
||||
* do not check in commented out code or unneeded files
|
||||
* the first line of the commit message should be a short
|
||||
description (50 characters is the soft limit, see DISCUSSION
|
||||
in git-commit(1)), and should skip the full stop
|
||||
* the body should provide a meaningful commit message, which:
|
||||
* uses the imperative, present tense: **change**,
|
||||
not **changed** or **changes**.
|
||||
* includes motivation for the change, and contrasts
|
||||
its implementation with previous behaviour
|
||||
* add a ``Signed-off-by: Your Name <you@example.com>`` line to the
|
||||
commit message (or just use the option `-s` when committing)
|
||||
to confirm that you agree to the **Developer's Certificate of Origin**
|
||||
* make sure that you have tests for the bug you are fixing
|
||||
* make sure that the test suite passes after your commit
|
||||
|
||||
# Long version:
|
||||
Patch
|
||||
=====
|
||||
|
||||
* use ``git format-patch -M`` to create the patch
|
||||
* do not PGP sign your patch
|
||||
* do not attach your patch, but read in the mail
|
||||
body, unless you cannot teach your mailer to
|
||||
leave the formatting of the patch alone.
|
||||
* be careful doing cut & paste into your mailer, not to
|
||||
corrupt whitespaces.
|
||||
* provide additional information (which is unsuitable for
|
||||
the commit message) between the ``---`` and the diffstat
|
||||
* if you change, add, or remove a command line option or
|
||||
make some other user interface change, the associated
|
||||
documentation should be updated as well.
|
||||
* if your name is not writable in ASCII, make sure that
|
||||
you send off a message in the correct encoding.
|
||||
* send the patch to the `mailing list`_ and the
|
||||
maintainer (nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net) if (and only if)
|
||||
the patch is ready for inclusion. If you use `git-send-email(1)`,
|
||||
please test it first by sending email to yourself.
|
||||
* see below for instructions specific to your mailer
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
============
|
||||
Long version
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
I started reading over the SubmittingPatches document for Git, primarily because
|
||||
I wanted to have a document similar to it for OfflineIMAP to make sure people
|
||||
understand what they are doing when they write "Signed-off-by" line.
|
||||
understand what they are doing when they write `Signed-off-by` line.
|
||||
|
||||
But the patch submission requirements are a lot more relaxed here on the
|
||||
technical/contents front, because the OfflineIMAP is a lot smaller ;-). So here
|
||||
is only the relevant bits.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decide what to base your work on.
|
||||
Decide what to base your work on
|
||||
================================
|
||||
|
||||
In general, always base your work on the oldest branch that your
|
||||
change is relevant to.
|
||||
|
||||
- A bugfix should be based on 'maint' in general. If the bug is not
|
||||
present in 'maint', base it on 'master'. For a bug that's not yet
|
||||
in 'master', find the topic that introduces the regression, and
|
||||
base your work on the tip of the topic.
|
||||
- A new feature should be based on 'master' in general. If the new
|
||||
feature depends on a topic that is in 'pu', but not in 'master',
|
||||
base your work on the tip of that topic.
|
||||
- Corrections and enhancements to a topic not yet in 'master' should
|
||||
be based on the tip of that topic. If the topic has not been merged
|
||||
to 'next', it's alright to add a note to squash minor corrections
|
||||
into the series.
|
||||
- In the exceptional case that a new feature depends on several topics
|
||||
not in 'master', start working on 'next' or 'pu' privately and send
|
||||
out patches for discussion. Before the final merge, you may have to
|
||||
wait until some of the dependent topics graduate to 'master', and
|
||||
rebase your work.
|
||||
* A bugfix should be based on 'maint' in general. If the bug is not
|
||||
present in 'maint', base it on 'master'. For a bug that's not yet
|
||||
in 'master', find the topic that introduces the regression, and
|
||||
base your work on the tip of the topic.
|
||||
* A new feature should be based on 'master' in general. If the new
|
||||
feature depends on a topic that is in 'pu', but not in 'master',
|
||||
base your work on the tip of that topic.
|
||||
* Corrections and enhancements to a topic not yet in 'master' should
|
||||
be based on the tip of that topic. If the topic has not been merged
|
||||
to 'next', it's alright to add a note to squash minor corrections
|
||||
into the series.
|
||||
* In the exceptional case that a new feature depends on several topics
|
||||
not in 'master', start working on 'next' or 'pu' privately and send
|
||||
out patches for discussion. Before the final merge, you may have to
|
||||
wait until some of the dependent topics graduate to 'master', and
|
||||
rebase your work.
|
||||
|
||||
To find the tip of a topic branch, run "git log --first-parent
|
||||
master..pu" and look for the merge commit. The second parent of this
|
||||
To find the tip of a topic branch, run ``git log --first-parent
|
||||
master..pu`` and look for the merge commit. The second parent of this
|
||||
commit is the tip of the topic branch.
|
||||
|
||||
## Make separate commits for logically separate changes.
|
||||
Make separate commits for logically separate changes
|
||||
====================================================
|
||||
|
||||
Unless your patch is really trivial, you should not be sending
|
||||
out a patch that was generated between your working tree and
|
||||
@ -101,13 +113,14 @@ archives back into the late 80's. Consider it like good Netiquette,
|
||||
but for code.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Generate your patch using git tools out of your commits.
|
||||
Generate your patch using git tools out of your commits
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
git based diff tools (git, Cogito, and StGIT included) generate
|
||||
unidiff which is the preferred format.
|
||||
|
||||
You do not have to be afraid to use -M option to "git diff" or
|
||||
"git format-patch", if your patch involves file renames. The
|
||||
You do not have to be afraid to use -M option to ``git diff`` or
|
||||
``git format-patch``, if your patch involves file renames. The
|
||||
receiving end can handle them just fine.
|
||||
|
||||
Please make sure your patch does not include any extra files
|
||||
@ -118,7 +131,8 @@ branch head. If you are preparing a work based on "next" branch,
|
||||
that is fine, but please mark it as such.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Sending your patches.
|
||||
Sending your patches
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
People on the mailing list need to be able to read and
|
||||
comment on the changes you are submitting. It is important for
|
||||
@ -138,7 +152,7 @@ not ready to be applied but it is for discussion, [PATCH v2],
|
||||
[PATCH v3] etc. are often seen when you are sending an update to
|
||||
what you have previously sent.
|
||||
|
||||
"git format-patch" command follows the best current practice to
|
||||
``git format-patch`` command follows the best current practice to
|
||||
format the body of an e-mail message. At the beginning of the
|
||||
patch should come your commit message, ending with the
|
||||
Signed-off-by: lines, and a line that consists of three dashes,
|
||||
@ -189,7 +203,8 @@ inclusion. Do not forget to add trailers such as "Acked-by:",
|
||||
necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Sign your work
|
||||
Sign your work
|
||||
==============
|
||||
|
||||
To improve tracking of who did what, we've borrowed the
|
||||
"sign-off" procedure from the Linux kernel project on patches
|
||||
@ -197,11 +212,12 @@ that are being emailed around. Although OfflineIMAP is a lot
|
||||
smaller project it is a good discipline to follow it.
|
||||
|
||||
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for
|
||||
the patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have
|
||||
the right to pass it on as a open-source patch. The rules are
|
||||
the patch, which **certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have
|
||||
the right to pass it on as a open-source patch**. The rules are
|
||||
pretty simple: if you can certify the below:
|
||||
|
||||
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
|
||||
**Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1**
|
||||
-----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -221,7 +237,7 @@ pretty simple: if you can certify the below:
|
||||
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
|
||||
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
|
||||
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
|
||||
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
|
||||
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
|
||||
@ -245,22 +261,22 @@ don't hide your real name.
|
||||
|
||||
If you like, you can put extra tags at the end:
|
||||
|
||||
+ "Reported-by:" is used to to credit someone who found the bug that
|
||||
* "Reported-by:" is used to to credit someone who found the bug that
|
||||
the patch attempts to fix.
|
||||
+ "Acked-by:" says that the person who is more familiar with the area
|
||||
* "Acked-by:" says that the person who is more familiar with the area
|
||||
the patch attempts to modify liked the patch.
|
||||
+ "Reviewed-by:", unlike the other tags, can only be offered by the
|
||||
* "Reviewed-by:", unlike the other tags, can only be offered by the
|
||||
reviewer and means that she is completely satisfied that the patch
|
||||
is ready for application. It is usually offered only after a
|
||||
detailed review.
|
||||
+ "Tested-by:" is used to indicate that the person applied the patch
|
||||
* "Tested-by:" is used to indicate that the person applied the patch
|
||||
and found it to have the desired effect.
|
||||
|
||||
You can also create your own tag or use one that's in common usage
|
||||
such as "Thanks-to:", "Based-on-patch-by:", or "Mentored-by:".
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
An ideal patch flow
|
||||
===================
|
||||
|
||||
Here is an ideal patch flow for this project the current maintainer
|
||||
suggests to the contributors:
|
||||
@ -274,7 +290,7 @@ suggests to the contributors:
|
||||
are butchering. These people happen to be the ones who are
|
||||
most likely to be knowledgeable enough to help you, but
|
||||
they have no obligation to help you (i.e. you ask for help,
|
||||
don't demand). "git log -p -- $area_you_are_modifying" would
|
||||
don't demand). ``git log -p -- $area_you_are_modifying`` would
|
||||
help you find out who they are.
|
||||
|
||||
(2) You get comments and suggestions for improvements. You may
|
||||
@ -294,22 +310,22 @@ from the list and queue it to 'pu', in order to make it easier for
|
||||
people play with it without having to pick up and apply the patch to
|
||||
their trees themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Know the status of your patch after submission
|
||||
----------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
* You can use Git itself to find out when your patch is merged in
|
||||
master. 'git pull --rebase' will automatically skip already-applied
|
||||
master. ``git pull --rebase`` will automatically skip already-applied
|
||||
patches, and will let you know. This works only if you rebase on top
|
||||
of the branch in which your patch has been merged (i.e. it will not
|
||||
tell you if your patch is merged in pu if you rebase on top of
|
||||
master).
|
||||
|
||||
* Read the git mailing list, the maintainer regularly posts messages
|
||||
.. * Read the git mailing list, the maintainer regularly posts messages
|
||||
entitled "What's cooking in git.git" and "What's in git.git" giving
|
||||
the status of various proposed changes.
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
MUA specific hints
|
||||
==================
|
||||
|
||||
Some of patches I receive or pick up from the list share common
|
||||
patterns of breakage. Please make sure your MUA is set up
|
||||
@ -331,7 +347,7 @@ One test you could do yourself if your MUA is set up correctly is:
|
||||
a.patch.
|
||||
|
||||
* Try to apply to the tip of the "master" branch from the
|
||||
git.git public repository:
|
||||
git.git public repository::
|
||||
|
||||
$ git fetch http://kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git master:test-apply
|
||||
$ git checkout test-apply
|
||||
@ -363,138 +379,138 @@ Pine
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
(Johannes Schindelin)
|
||||
I don't know how many people still use pine, but for those poor souls it may
|
||||
be good to mention that the quell-flowed-text is needed for recent versions.
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know how many people still use pine, but for those poor
|
||||
souls it may be good to mention that the quell-flowed-text is
|
||||
needed for recent versions.
|
||||
|
||||
... the "no-strip-whitespace-before-send" option, too. AFAIK it
|
||||
was introduced in 4.60.
|
||||
... the "no-strip-whitespace-before-send" option, too. AFAIK it was introduced
|
||||
in 4.60.
|
||||
|
||||
(Linus Torvalds)
|
||||
And 4.58 needs at least this
|
||||
|
||||
And 4.58 needs at least this.
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
diff-tree 8326dd8350be64ac7fc805f6563a1d61ad10d32c (from e886a61f76edf5410573e92e38ce22974f9c40f1)
|
||||
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
|
||||
Date: Mon Aug 15 17:23:51 2005 -0700
|
||||
---
|
||||
diff-tree 8326dd8350be64ac7fc805f6563a1d61ad10d32c (from e886a61f76edf5410573e92e38ce22974f9c40f1)
|
||||
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
|
||||
Date: Mon Aug 15 17:23:51 2005 -0700
|
||||
|
||||
Fix pine whitespace-corruption bug
|
||||
Fix pine whitespace-corruption bug
|
||||
|
||||
There's no excuse for unconditionally removing whitespace from
|
||||
the pico buffers on close.
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/pico/pico.c b/pico/pico.c
|
||||
--- a/pico/pico.c
|
||||
+++ b/pico/pico.c
|
||||
@@ -219,7 +219,9 @@ PICO *pm;
|
||||
switch(pico_all_done){ /* prepare for/handle final events */
|
||||
case COMP_EXIT : /* already confirmed */
|
||||
packheader();
|
||||
+#if 0
|
||||
stripwhitespace();
|
||||
+#endif
|
||||
c |= COMP_EXIT;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
There's no excuse for unconditionally removing whitespace from
|
||||
the pico buffers on close.
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/pico/pico.c b/pico/pico.c
|
||||
--- a/pico/pico.c
|
||||
+++ b/pico/pico.c
|
||||
@@ -219,7 +219,9 @@ PICO *pm;
|
||||
switch(pico_all_done){ /* prepare for/handle final events */
|
||||
case COMP_EXIT : /* already confirmed */
|
||||
packheader();
|
||||
+#if 0
|
||||
stripwhitespace();
|
||||
+#endif
|
||||
c |= COMP_EXIT;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
(Daniel Barkalow)
|
||||
> A patch to SubmittingPatches, MUA specific help section for
|
||||
> users of Pine 4.63 would be very much appreciated.
|
||||
|
||||
> A patch to SubmittingPatches, MUA specific help section for
|
||||
> users of Pine 4.63 would be very much appreciated.
|
||||
|
||||
Ah, it looks like a recent version changed the default behavior to do the
|
||||
right thing, and inverted the sense of the configuration option. (Either
|
||||
that or Gentoo did it.) So you need to set the
|
||||
"no-strip-whitespace-before-send" option, unless the option you have is
|
||||
"strip-whitespace-before-send", in which case you should avoid checking
|
||||
it.
|
||||
Ah, it looks like a recent version changed the default behavior to do the
|
||||
right thing, and inverted the sense of the configuration option. (Either
|
||||
that or Gentoo did it.) So you need to set the
|
||||
"no-strip-whitespace-before-send" option, unless the option you have is
|
||||
"strip-whitespace-before-send", in which case you should avoid checking
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Thunderbird
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
(A Large Angry SCM)
|
||||
By default, Thunderbird will both wrap emails as well as flag them as
|
||||
being 'format=flowed', both of which will make the resulting email unusable
|
||||
by git.
|
||||
|
||||
By default, Thunderbird will both wrap emails as well as flag them as
|
||||
being 'format=flowed', both of which will make the resulting email unusable
|
||||
by git.
|
||||
Here are some hints on how to successfully submit patches inline using
|
||||
Thunderbird.
|
||||
|
||||
Here are some hints on how to successfully submit patches inline using
|
||||
Thunderbird.
|
||||
There are two different approaches. One approach is to configure
|
||||
Thunderbird to not mangle patches. The second approach is to use
|
||||
an external editor to keep Thunderbird from mangling the patches.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two different approaches. One approach is to configure
|
||||
Thunderbird to not mangle patches. The second approach is to use
|
||||
an external editor to keep Thunderbird from mangling the patches.
|
||||
**Approach #1 (configuration):**
|
||||
|
||||
Approach #1 (configuration):
|
||||
This recipe is current as of Thunderbird 2.0.0.19. Three steps:
|
||||
|
||||
This recipe is current as of Thunderbird 2.0.0.19. Three steps:
|
||||
1. Configure your mail server composition as plain text
|
||||
Edit...Account Settings...Composition & Addressing,
|
||||
uncheck 'Compose Messages in HTML'.
|
||||
2. Configure your general composition window to not wrap
|
||||
Edit..Preferences..Composition, wrap plain text messages at 0
|
||||
3. Disable the use of format=flowed
|
||||
Edit..Preferences..Advanced..Config Editor. Search for:
|
||||
mailnews.send_plaintext_flowed
|
||||
toggle it to make sure it is set to 'false'.
|
||||
1. Configure your mail server composition as plain text
|
||||
Edit...Account Settings...Composition & Addressing,
|
||||
uncheck 'Compose Messages in HTML'.
|
||||
2. Configure your general composition window to not wrap
|
||||
Edit..Preferences..Composition, wrap plain text messages at 0
|
||||
3. Disable the use of format=flowed
|
||||
Edit..Preferences..Advanced..Config Editor. Search for:
|
||||
mailnews.send_plaintext_flowed
|
||||
toggle it to make sure it is set to 'false'.
|
||||
|
||||
After that is done, you should be able to compose email as you
|
||||
otherwise would (cut + paste, git-format-patch | git-imap-send, etc),
|
||||
and the patches should not be mangled.
|
||||
After that is done, you should be able to compose email as you
|
||||
otherwise would (cut + paste, git-format-patch | git-imap-send, etc),
|
||||
and the patches should not be mangled.
|
||||
|
||||
Approach #2 (external editor):
|
||||
**Approach #2 (external editor):**
|
||||
|
||||
This recipe appears to work with the current [*1*] Thunderbird from Suse.
|
||||
|
||||
The following Thunderbird extensions are needed:
|
||||
AboutConfig 0.5
|
||||
http://aboutconfig.mozdev.org/
|
||||
External Editor 0.7.2
|
||||
http://globs.org/articles.php?lng=en&pg=8
|
||||
AboutConfig 0.5
|
||||
http://aboutconfig.mozdev.org/
|
||||
External Editor 0.7.2
|
||||
http://globs.org/articles.php?lng=en&pg=8
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1) Prepare the patch as a text file using your method of choice.
|
||||
|
||||
2) Before opening a compose window, use Edit->Account Settings to
|
||||
uncheck the "Compose messages in HTML format" setting in the
|
||||
"Composition & Addressing" panel of the account to be used to send the
|
||||
patch. [*2*]
|
||||
uncheck the "Compose messages in HTML format" setting in the
|
||||
"Composition & Addressing" panel of the account to be used to send the
|
||||
patch. [*2*]
|
||||
|
||||
3) In the main Thunderbird window, _before_ you open the compose window
|
||||
for the patch, use Tools->about:config to set the following to the
|
||||
indicated values:
|
||||
mailnews.send_plaintext_flowed => false
|
||||
mailnews.wraplength => 0
|
||||
for the patch, use Tools->about:config to set the following to the
|
||||
indicated values::
|
||||
|
||||
mailnews.send_plaintext_flowed => false
|
||||
mailnews.wraplength => 0
|
||||
|
||||
4) Open a compose window and click the external editor icon.
|
||||
|
||||
5) In the external editor window, read in the patch file and exit the
|
||||
editor normally.
|
||||
editor normally.
|
||||
|
||||
6) Back in the compose window: Add whatever other text you wish to the
|
||||
message, complete the addressing and subject fields, and press send.
|
||||
message, complete the addressing and subject fields, and press send.
|
||||
|
||||
7) Optionally, undo the about:config/account settings changes made in
|
||||
steps 2 & 3.
|
||||
steps 2 & 3.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[Footnotes]
|
||||
|
||||
*1* Version 1.0 (20041207) from the MozillaThunderbird-1.0-5 rpm of Suse
|
||||
9.3 professional updates.
|
||||
|
||||
*2* It may be possible to do this with about:config and the following
|
||||
settings but I haven't tried, yet.
|
||||
mail.html_compose => false
|
||||
mail.identity.default.compose_html => false
|
||||
mail.identity.id?.compose_html => false
|
||||
settings but I haven't tried, yet::
|
||||
|
||||
mail.html_compose => false
|
||||
mail.identity.default.compose_html => false
|
||||
mail.identity.id?.compose_html => false
|
||||
|
||||
(Lukas Sandström)
|
||||
|
||||
There is a script in contrib/thunderbird-patch-inline which can help
|
||||
you include patches with Thunderbird in an easy way. To use it, do the
|
||||
steps above and then use the script as the external editor.
|
||||
There is a script in contrib/thunderbird-patch-inline which can help you
|
||||
include patches with Thunderbird in an easy way. To use it, do the steps above
|
||||
and then use the script as the external editor.
|
||||
|
||||
Gnus
|
||||
----
|
||||
@ -521,12 +537,12 @@ This should help you to submit patches inline using KMail.
|
||||
2) Click on New Mail.
|
||||
|
||||
3) Go under "Options" in the Composer window and be sure that
|
||||
"Word wrap" is not set.
|
||||
"Word wrap" is not set.
|
||||
|
||||
4) Use Message -> Insert file... and insert the patch.
|
||||
|
||||
5) Back in the compose window: add whatever other text you wish to the
|
||||
message, complete the addressing and subject fields, and press send.
|
||||
message, complete the addressing and subject fields, and press send.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Gmail
|
||||
@ -538,39 +554,39 @@ use "git send-email" and send your patches through the GMail SMTP server, or
|
||||
use any IMAP email client to connect to the google IMAP server and forward
|
||||
the emails through that.
|
||||
|
||||
To use "git send-email" and send your patches through the GMail SMTP server,
|
||||
edit ~/.gitconfig to specify your account settings:
|
||||
To use ``git send-email`` and send your patches through the GMail SMTP server,
|
||||
edit `~/.gitconfig` to specify your account settings::
|
||||
|
||||
[sendemail]
|
||||
smtpencryption = tls
|
||||
smtpserver = smtp.gmail.com
|
||||
smtpuser = user@gmail.com
|
||||
smtppass = p4ssw0rd
|
||||
smtpserverport = 587
|
||||
[sendemail]
|
||||
smtpencryption = tls
|
||||
smtpserver = smtp.gmail.com
|
||||
smtpuser = user@gmail.com
|
||||
smtppass = p4ssw0rd
|
||||
smtpserverport = 587
|
||||
|
||||
Once your commits are ready to be sent to the mailing list, run the
|
||||
following commands:
|
||||
following commands::
|
||||
|
||||
$ git format-patch --cover-letter -M origin/master -o outgoing/
|
||||
$ edit outgoing/0000-*
|
||||
$ git send-email outgoing/*
|
||||
|
||||
To submit using the IMAP interface, first, edit your ~/.gitconfig to specify your
|
||||
account settings:
|
||||
To submit using the IMAP interface, first, edit your `~/.gitconfig` to specify your
|
||||
account settings::
|
||||
|
||||
[imap]
|
||||
folder = "[Gmail]/Drafts"
|
||||
host = imaps://imap.gmail.com
|
||||
user = user@gmail.com
|
||||
pass = p4ssw0rd
|
||||
port = 993
|
||||
sslverify = false
|
||||
[imap]
|
||||
folder = "[Gmail]/Drafts"
|
||||
host = imaps://imap.gmail.com
|
||||
user = user@gmail.com
|
||||
pass = p4ssw0rd
|
||||
port = 993
|
||||
sslverify = false
|
||||
|
||||
You might need to instead use: folder = "[Google Mail]/Drafts" if you get an error
|
||||
that the "Folder doesn't exist".
|
||||
|
||||
Once your commits are ready to be sent to the mailing list, run the
|
||||
following commands:
|
||||
following commands::
|
||||
|
||||
$ git format-patch --cover-letter -M --stdout origin/master | git imap-send
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user